SEC v. Jon E. Montroll and Bitfunder (unregistered distributions, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In February 2018 the SEC charged Jon E. Montroll and the former bitcoin-denominated platform BitFunder with operating an unregistered securities exchange and related fraud. A consent final judgment as to Montroll, filed December 11, 2020, orders disgorgement of $155,572.53, deemed satisfied by a criminal restitution order.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24078 |
| Date filed | 2018-03-23 |
| Date resolved | 2020-12-11 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | crypto |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: criminal case referred to, outcome not stated in the document (Jon E. Montroll), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Defendants | Jon E. Montroll ; Bitfunder |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.20(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Unregistered distributions |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $156k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $156k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC announced this matter on March 23, 2018 as release LR-24078, in the Southern District of New York, describing a bitcoin-denominated trading platform and its operator. This library tags the matter as unregistered distributions; the conduct is recorded against crypto, and the tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
Outcome: the final judgment as to Montroll, filed December 11, 2020 and posted by the SEC, records that he consented to its entry and waived findings. It permanently enjoins him from violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 and holds him liable for disgorgement of $155,572.53, deemed satisfied by the order of restitution in United States v. Montroll. The signing date line in the copy we opened is blank, so the filing date is used. The judgment shows no civil penalty or interest. It covers Montroll only; the outcome for BitFunder was not checked.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Unregistered distributions — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-03-23 Litigation release published
- 2020-12-11 Consent final judgment as to Montroll filed (S.D.N.Y.)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Zachary Miller (unregistered distributions, 2026) | SEC | 2026-03-05 | Unregistered Distributions | — | settled |
| SEC v. David Hudzik (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-12-23 | Unregistered Distributions | $70k | judgment |
| SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch and others (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-06-20 | Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions | $204k | judgment |
| SEC v. Peter Scalise III and The3rdBevco Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-06-17 | Unregistered Distributions | $236k | settled |
| SEC v. Investview, Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) | SEC | 2025-01-17 | Unregistered Distributions | $375k | settled |
| SEC v. Tai Mo Shan Limited (unregistered distributions, 2024) | SEC | 2024-12-20 | Unregistered Distributions | $36.7m | settled |