SEC v. Aaron Cain McKnight and others (2023)
Alleged — pending
These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2023 the SEC charged Aaron Cain McKnight, BPM Global Investments, LLC and 5 others. The complaint alleges that McKnight ran three investment schemes that took more than $8.4 million from at least 28 investors, using the money for personal and business expenses and, in part, payments to earlier investors. Only Sims settled, by a bifurcated consent judgment; the other claims are pending.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25677 |
| Date filed | 2023-03-27 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas |
| Status | filed |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction |
| Defendants | Aaron Cain McKnight ; BPM Global Investments, LLC ; BPM Asset Management, LLC ; Sherry Rebekka Sims ; Harmony Brooke McKnight ; Kenneth Miller ; Frost & Miller, LLP |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.20(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 27, 2023 as release LR-25677. The complaint alleges that McKnight ran three investment schemes that took more than $8.4 million from at least 28 investors, using the money for personal and business expenses and, in part, payments to earlier investors. Only Sims settled, by a bifurcated consent judgment; the other claims are pending. Ponzi-like payments are one listed use of funds, not the charge.
This library does not tag the matter as a Ponzi scheme: on a source check, the document mentions Ponzi-like payments only in passing, or as part of another party's scheme, and the charges are about something else. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction.
This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been.
Timeline
- 2023-03-27 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.