SEC v. Waddell & Reed, LLC (2022)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Waddell & Reed, LLC, over failing to monitor wrap-fee advisory accounts for inactivity. The release records a civil penalty of $200,000, disgorgement of $484,645, prejudgment interest of $90,944.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-21107 |
| Date filed | 2022-09-19 |
| Date resolved | 2022-09-19 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Waddell & Reed, LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $200k
- Disgorgement
- $485k
- Prejudgment interest
- $90.9k
- Total relief
- $776k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 19, 2022 as release 3-21107. The respondents named are Waddell & Reed, LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This order's uses of "churning" are all in the phrase "reverse churning" — a wrap-fee account traded too little, the mirror image of the excessive trading this library's churning technique describes. Nothing in the order alleges that any customer account was traded excessively, so this library does not tag the matter with any technique; no separate slug in this taxonomy covers reverse churning.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $200,000, disgorgement of $484,645, prejudgment interest of $90,944. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.