Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. James S. Tagliaferri (ponzi schemes, 2013)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-tagliaferri-ponzi-schemes-2013) by email

In February 2013 the SEC instituted administrative proceedings against investment adviser James S. Tagliaferri, alleging undisclosed conflicts and a Ponzi-like scheme, on the day a parallel criminal indictment was unsealed. After his criminal conviction the proceeding became a follow-on case, and the Commission's February 15, 2017 opinion upheld permanent industry and penny-stock bars.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-15215
Date filed 2013-02-21
Date resolved 2017-02-15
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Venue OTC
Criminal parallel Yes: sentenced (James Tagliaferri), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Sentence 6 years
Bars imposed industry-wide association bar, penny stock bar, investment company bar
Defendants James S. Tagliaferri (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The order instituting proceedings alleged, and did not find, that from at least 2007 to 2010 Tagliaferri, through his firm TAG Virgin Islands, put client money into promissory notes issued by companies tied to one individual without disclosing the kickbacks TAG received, and that when the notes fell due he raised the repayments by buying thinly traded stock for other clients from that individual.

Outcome. The proceeding was stayed at the request of the U.S. Attorney while a parallel criminal case, United States v. Tagliaferri (S.D.N.Y.), went forward. The administrative law judge's March 23, 2016 initial decision records that he was convicted of investment adviser fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud and related crimes, sentenced to 72 months in prison, and ordered to forfeit $2.5 million and pay nearly $21 million in restitution. The proceeding had been converted into a follow-on case based on the conviction, and the judge granted summary disposition, imposing permanent associational, penny-stock and investment-company bars. Tagliaferri appealed, and in an opinion dated February 15, 2017 the Commission found the associational and penny-stock bars in the public interest. The Commission's earlier decision to drop civil penalty and disgorgement from the case because of the criminal sentence means the administrative record shows no SEC penalty or disgorgement. We did not check whether any later court review followed the Commission opinion.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the order alleges a Ponzi-like scheme in which some clients' assets were used to repay other clients. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2013-02-21 Administrative proceeding instituted (administrative)
  2. 2016-03-23 Initial decision: permanent industry and penny-stock bars
  3. 2017-02-15 Commission opinion upholds associational and penny-stock bars

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.