SEC v. Robert Newell and Black Hawk Funding, Inc. (2026)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2026 the SEC announced a judgment against Robert Newell and Black Hawk Funding, Inc.. On 7 May 2026 a final judgment was entered against fund manager Newell, ordering $668,300 in disgorgement, $254,067 in interest and a $668,300 penalty, with a five-year bar from securities offerings. The complaint alleged he and his firm raised about $37.7 million for a cannabis fund and misused it, including Ponzi-like payments, among other misuses.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26553 |
| Date filed | 2026-05-14 |
| Date resolved | 2026-05-14 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Robert Newell ; Black Hawk Funding, Inc. |
| Also named elsewhere | Black Hawk Funding, Inc. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $668k
- Disgorgement
- $668k
- Prejudgment interest
- $254k
- Total relief
- $1.6m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on May 14, 2026 as release LR-26553. On 7 May 2026 a final judgment was entered against fund manager Newell, ordering $668,300 in disgorgement, $254,067 in interest and a $668,300 penalty, with a five-year bar from securities offerings. The complaint alleged he and his firm raised about $37.7 million for a cannabis fund and misused it, including Ponzi-like payments, among other misuses.
This library does not tag the matter as a Ponzi scheme: on a source check, the document mentions Ponzi-like payments only in passing, or as part of another party's scheme, and the charges are about something else. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil penalty of $668,300, disgorgement of $668,300, prejudgment interest of $254,067, as the release or order states it. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Timeline
- 2026-05-14 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.