SEC v. Palmer Square Capital Management LLC (cross trading, 2020)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2020, the SEC settled charges against Palmer Square Capital Management LLC, ordering a US$450,000 penalty for 351 prearranged cross trades between client accounts that did not meet the rules for cross trades with registered investment companies.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-20039 |
| Date filed | 2020-09-21 |
| Date resolved | 2020-09-21 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Palmer Square Capital Management LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $450k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $450k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 21, 2020 as release 3-20039. The respondents named are Palmer Square Capital Management LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).
The order finds that Palmer Square, an investment adviser, sold securities from one client account to another through a broker 351 times, with a markup that the buying account paid, without the required cross-trade procedures and, in 13 cases, without disclosure and consent for principal transactions. Broker markups totalled $242,193.
This library applies no technique tag to the matter. The charge is an adviser compliance violation involving client accounts. It is not a trade designed to mislead the market about price or volume.
A $450,000 civil money penalty and a censure.
Palmer Square consented to the order without admitting or denying the findings.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.