Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Naris Chamroonrat (2017)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-naris-chamroonrat-et-al-2017) by email

In September 2017 the SEC announced a New Jersey final judgment against Naris Chamroonrat, an operator of the phony Nonko Trading day-trading firm, ordering $918,147 in disgorgement and $71,549 in interest, deemed satisfied by criminal restitution.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23946
Date filed 2017-09-28
Date resolved 2017-09-28
Court U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
Status judgment
Criminal parallel Yes: guilty plea (Naris Chamroonrat), U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
Defendants Naris Chamroonrat (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
$918k
Prejudgment interest
$71.5k
Total relief
$990k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The September 18, 2017 judgment permanently enjoins him from antifraud and broker registration violations. He pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case and awaited sentencing. The scheme, as the SEC describes it, gave customers simulated accounts whose orders never reached the market, taking more than $1.4 million from hundreds of investors.

It is a fake-brokerage fraud, not a Ponzi scheme, so the ponzi-schemes tag has been removed, as on the earlier Nonko Trading records. The record had no money.

Timeline

  1. 2017-09-28 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.