SEC v. Naris Chamroonrat (2017)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2017 the SEC announced a New Jersey final judgment against Naris Chamroonrat, an operator of the phony Nonko Trading day-trading firm, ordering $918,147 in disgorgement and $71,549 in interest, deemed satisfied by criminal restitution.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23946 |
| Date filed | 2017-09-28 |
| Date resolved | 2017-09-28 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: guilty plea (Naris Chamroonrat), U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Defendants | Naris Chamroonrat |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $918k
- Prejudgment interest
- $71.5k
- Total relief
- $990k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The September 18, 2017 judgment permanently enjoins him from antifraud and broker registration violations. He pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case and awaited sentencing. The scheme, as the SEC describes it, gave customers simulated accounts whose orders never reached the market, taking more than $1.4 million from hundreds of investors.
It is a fake-brokerage fraud, not a Ponzi scheme, so the ponzi-schemes tag has been removed, as on the earlier Nonko Trading records. The record had no money.
Timeline
- 2017-09-28 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.