SEC v. Moynes, et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2023)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission published a release announcing it had obtained final judgments against Bradley Moynes and Digatrade for concealed ownership and sales into paid promotion. This library classifies the conduct as undisclosed control blocks and pump and dump. The release records a civil penalty of $307,183, disgorgement of $1,490,400.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25661 |
| Date filed | 2023-03-09 |
| Date resolved | 2023-03-09 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Moynes, et al. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques | Undisclosed control blocks , Pump and dump |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $307k
- Disgorgement
- $1.5m
- Prejudgment interest
- $254k
- Total relief
- $2.1m
- Alleged gain
- $1.5m
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 9, 2023 as release LR-25661. The respondents named are Moynes, et al. (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts.
The release reports judgments against Moynes (disgorgement $1,042,407, penalty $207,183) and Digatrade (disgorgement $510,000 of which $62,007 is joint, penalty $100,000). The recorded disgorgement counts the joint amount once. No concealed-payment allegation is made.
This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks and pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
Non-monetary relief recorded: officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil penalty of $307,183, disgorgement of $1,490,400. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Undisclosed control blocks — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Pump and dump — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2023-03-09 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-27 | SEC | SEC v. Moynes, et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2022) | Settled |
| 2023-03-09 | SEC | SEC v. Moynes, et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2023) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) | SEC | 2025-02-07 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | $22.6m | judgment |
| SEC v. Kevan Casey, Adrian James, Jonathan Friedlander and Robert Wheat (pump and dump, 2024) | SEC | 2024-08-09 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | filed |
| SEC v. Giguiere et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-06-13 | Undisclosed Control Blocks , Matched Orders +1 | $875k | judgment |
| SEC v. George Stubos, et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) | SEC | 2024-04-15 | Undisclosed Control Blocks , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Jonathan Farber, Aarif Jamani, Brian Keasberry (pump and dump, 2024) | SEC | 2024-01-16 | Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks | — | filed |
| SEC v. George Stubos (undisclosed control blocks, 2023) | SEC | 2023-09-12 | Undisclosed Control Blocks , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |