SEC v. Matthew A. Krimm, et al. (2019)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In June 2019 the SEC announced default judgments in Delaware against Matthew Krimm and Krimm Financial Services, jointly liable for $913,537 of disgorgement, $161,277 of interest and a $913,537 penalty, for inducing at least 25 investors to put over $1.69 million into promissory notes for a mortgage business that did not exist.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24519 |
| Date filed | 2019-06-27 |
| Date resolved | 2019-06-27 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of Delaware |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: guilty plea (Krimm (Delaware Department of Justice prosecution; awaiting sentencing)) |
| Defendants | Matthew A. Krimm ; Krimm Financial Services, LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $914k
- Disgorgement
- $914k
- Prejudgment interest
- $161k
- Total relief
- $2m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC announced the judgments of May 28, 2019 on June 27, 2019 (LR-24519); the complaint was filed in April 2017. Over 75% of the money allegedly went to Krimm's personal expenses and to payments to prior investors. Krimm pleaded guilty in a parallel Delaware case to securities fraud and theft.
The record showed about $2 million as disgorgement, which was the sum of disgorgement and the penalty. The Ponzi tag is removed because the release describes a mortgage offering fraud.
Timeline
- 2019-06-27 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.