SEC v. Lawrence D. Polizzotto (2013)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2013 the SEC settled with Lawrence Polizzotto, former head of investor relations at First Solar, for selectively disclosing to analysts and investors that the company would not receive an expected Department of Energy loan guarantee. He paid a $50,000 penalty. The violation is of Regulation FD, not insider trading.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-70337 |
| Date filed | 2013-09-06 |
| Date resolved | 2013-09-06 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Lawrence D. Polizzotto |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.13(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $50k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $50k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the order on September 6, 2013.
The order finds that on September 21, 2011 Polizzotto told about 20 sell-side analysts and institutional investors of the lost loan guarantee, directed a subordinate to make similar calls, and the stock fell six percent when the company disclosed it publicly the next morning, causing First Solar's violation of Regulation FD.
No trading on the information is alleged, so the insider-trading tag has been removed.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.