SEC v. John James Sheehan, Jr. (ponzi schemes, 2020)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2020 the SEC settled an administrative order against John James Sheehan, Jr., finding he was an unreasonable figurehead for the Saivian Ponzi and pyramid scheme, with a $37,500 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 33-10742 |
| Date filed | 2020-01-10 |
| Date resolved | 2020-01-10 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | John James Sheehan, Jr. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $37.5k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $37.5k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
On January 10, 2020 the SEC accepted a settlement with John James Sheehan, Jr., who served as the public-facing president of Saivian LLC between November 2015 and October 2016 without real control. The order finds he made inaccurate statements about the business and masked Eric Dalius's control, violating Securities Act Section 17(a)(3), and imposes a $37,500 penalty. Saivian offered unregistered securities in what the order calls a fraudulent Ponzi and pyramid scheme.
Sheehan is not found to have violated Section 5; the unregistered offering is attributed to Saivian, so the unregistered distributions tag has been replaced with ponzi schemes.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the document describes. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |