SEC v. Jetronic Industries, Inc. and others (registration revocation, 2012)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In June 2012 an SEC administrative law judge issued an initial decision revoking the registration of the securities of Jetronic Industries, Inc. (now New Bastion Development, Inc.) for failing to file periodic reports under Exchange Act Section 12(j); the proceeding against the other named issuers had already ended. It is a delinquent-filer case and alleges no manipulation.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-14767 |
| Date filed | 2012-06-25 |
| Date resolved | 2012-06-25 |
| Court | SEC administrative law judge |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Jetronic Industries, Inc. (n/k/a New Bastion Development, Inc.) ; Lions Petroleum, Inc. (n/k/a China Hongxing Agritech, Inc.) ; MDI, Inc. ; Mobilepro Corp. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.13(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on June 25, 2012 as release 3-14767. The respondents named are Jetronic Industries, Inc. (n/k/a New Bastion Development, Inc.), Lions Petroleum, Inc. (n/k/a China Hongxing Agritech, Inc.), MDI, Inc. and Mobilepro Corp. (0 individuals, 4 entities). The action was brought in the SEC administrative law judge.
The decision rests on the issuer's failure to file required periodic reports. Its pump-and-dump and shell-hijacking language is the company's own argument that it was not a dormant shell at risk of fraud, not a finding. This library carries no technique tag on this matter.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The action was dismissed. We keep dismissed matters in the library precisely so that the outcome is visible alongside the original allegation.
Timeline
- 2012-06-25 Initial decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.