SEC v. Dow Rockwell LLC and Richard Dow Rockwell (2024)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2024 the SEC announced a judgment against Dow Rockwell LLC and Richard Dow Rockwell. Consent judgments of 25 November 2024 resolve a 2022 complaint alleging that the adviser and its owner failed to disclose compensation and a founder's conviction while recommending Professional Financial Investors, which the SEC says ran a Ponzi scheme. They owe jointly $402,075 in disgorgement, $121,844 in interest and an $80,000 penalty; the respondents are not charged with running the Ponzi scheme.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26185 |
| Date filed | 2024-12-03 |
| Date resolved | 2024-12-03 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Dow Rockwell LLC ; Richard Dow Rockwell |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $80k
- Disgorgement
- $402k
- Prejudgment interest
- $122k
- Total relief
- $604k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on December 3, 2024 as release LR-26185. Consent judgments of 25 November 2024 resolve a 2022 complaint alleging that the adviser and its owner failed to disclose compensation and a founder's conviction while recommending Professional Financial Investors, which the SEC says ran a Ponzi scheme. They owe jointly $402,075 in disgorgement, $121,844 in interest and an $80,000 penalty; the respondents are not charged with running the Ponzi scheme.
This library does not tag the matter as a Ponzi scheme: on a source check, the document mentions Ponzi-like payments only in passing, or as part of another party's scheme, and the charges are about something else. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil penalty of $80,000, disgorgement of $402,075, prejudgment interest of $121,844, as the release or order states it. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Timeline
- 2024-12-03 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.