Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Dean Shah et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2022)

Alleged — pending

These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-dean-shah-et-al-undisclosed-control-blocks-2022) by email

In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission published a release alleging concealed control of Zenosense, hired promotion and sales into the resulting demand. This library classifies the conduct as undisclosed control blocks and pump and dump. No monetary relief has been recorded at this stage; the matter is an allegation and remains unproven. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-25367
Date filed 2022-04-15
Status filed
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel Yes: charged (Csurgo), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 2022-04-15
Bars imposed conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar
Defendants Dean Shah et al. (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Undisclosed control blocks , Pump and dump

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 15, 2022 as release LR-25367. The respondents named are Dean Shah et al. (1 individual, 0 entities).

The complaint alleges that defendants hid their control of Zenosense through nominee accounts, hired promoters to generate demand and sold into it. No payment-nondisclosure allegation is made, so the paid-promotion tag has been replaced with pump and dump.

This library tags the matter as undisclosed control blocks and pump and dump, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-04-15 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Airborne Wireless Network and others (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-02-07 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks $22.6m judgment
SEC v. Kevan Casey, Adrian James, Jonathan Friedlander and Robert Wheat (pump and dump, 2024) SEC 2024-08-09 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks — filed
SEC v. Giguiere et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) SEC 2024-06-13 Undisclosed Control Blocks , Matched Orders +1 $875k judgment
SEC v. George Stubos, et al. (undisclosed control blocks, 2024) SEC 2024-04-15 Undisclosed Control Blocks , Pump And Dump — judgment
SEC v. Jonathan Farber, Aarif Jamani, Brian Keasberry (pump and dump, 2024) SEC 2024-01-16 Pump And Dump , Undisclosed Control Blocks — filed
SEC v. George Stubos (undisclosed control blocks, 2023) SEC 2023-09-12 Undisclosed Control Blocks , Pump And Dump — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. If this matter has since resolved, been withdrawn or been dismissed, we want to know: submit a correction.