SEBI v. PNB Finance and Industries Ltd, Samir Jain and others (hidden promoters, 2023)

Judgment entered

✓ Checked against the primary document on October 9, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sebi-69479-market-abuse-2023) by email

In March 2023 a SEBI whole time member found that PNB Finance and Industries and its controllers hid several family members as non-promoters to avoid minimum public shareholding rules, and fined them about Rs 20.85 crore in total. It was issued with a companion order on Camac Commercial the same day.

The record

What was ordered

Civil penalty

—

Disgorgement

—

Prejudgment interest

—

Total relief

—

Alleged gain

—

Penalty as published

209m INR

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in INR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

This final order of 28 March 2023 was made by SEBI whole time member S. K. Mohanty. It names nine noticees: PNB Finance and Industries Ltd, a company listed on the Calcutta Stock Exchange, Samir Jain, Meera Jain, Indu Jain, Trishla Jain and four corporate shareholders, Ashoka Viniyoga, Artee Viniyoga, Camac Commercial Company and Combine Holding. Indu Jain died in May 2021 and the case against her abated.

As in the companion Camac order, the case arose from complaints that several little-known companies holding large stakes in the Times Group parent had hidden who controlled them. SEBI examined the period 2013 to 2019 and alleged that the family members who ran the company were never disclosed as promoters, that the company repeatedly filed shareholding patterns that listed them as public, and that this let it avoid minimum public shareholding rules. Trishla Jain had held shares until September 2015 and then transferred them to Indu Jain.

The whole time member held the charges substantially established, including breach of section 12A of the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations 3(b), 3(c) and 4(1), alongside takeover-code and insider-trading disclosure failures and the public shareholding breach.

The directions required corrected promoter disclosures, restrained the promoters from the securities market until the company complies, and barred two individuals from director and managerial roles until then. The company was penalised Rs 1 crore, Rs 1 crore, Rs 5 crore and Rs 5 crore under different sections, Rs 12 crore in total. Seven other noticees were also penalised under three further heads: Mr and Ms Jain and four corporate shareholders at Rs 21 lakh, Rs 20 lakh and Rs 1 crore each, and Trishla Jain at Rs 9 lakh, Rs 10 lakh and Rs 20 lakh. All the amounts together come to about Rs 20.85 crore.

The record does not show whether the order was appealed or whether public shareholding has since been restored.

This library tags the matter as misleading issuer disclosure, because the finding is that the issuer repeatedly filed a false shareholding picture. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

• Misleading issuer disclosure — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

1. 2023-03-28 SEBI order

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

• SEBI order
• SEBI order (PDF)

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Related actions

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Record added October 8, 2026. submit a correction.