Market Manipulation. Search

SEBI v. Narendra Ramanlal Shah and others (Universal Credit and Securities SMS tips, 2022)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 8, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sebi-64564-matched-orders-2022) by email

On 31 October 2022 a SEBI adjudicating officer penalised seven people and companies Rs 1 crore in total over trading in Universal Credit and Securities shares in 2017-18, a period when over 15 lakh bulk SMS messages recommended buying with high price targets. The case against an eighth noticee, a company struck off the register, was not pursued.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEBI (India)
Date filed 2022-10-31
Date resolved 2022-10-31
Court SEBI adjudicating officer
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Instruments Universal Credit and Securities Ltd shares
Venue BSE
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Narendra Ramanlal Shah (individual) ; Vimala Sanjay Patel (individual) ; Earth Exim Limited (entity) ; Bonanza Industries Limited (entity) ; Preeti Ajay Nathwani (individual) ; Ajay Nathwani (individual) ; Deepak Parashram Salvi (individual)
Techniques Price manipulation , Pump and dump

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—
Penalty as published
10m INR

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in INR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

SEBI received complaints about bulk text messages recommending Universal Credit and Securities Ltd (UCSL), a BSE-listed company, with price targets of Rs 18, Rs 25 and Rs 40 and more, and investigated July 2017 to January 2018. The order of 31 October 2022 names eight noticees: Narendra Ramanlal Shah, a director of UCSL and of Earth Exim; Vimala Sanjay Patel; RCG Finance Pvt Ltd; Earth Exim Ltd; Bonanza Industries Ltd; Preeti and Ajay Nathwani; and Deepak Parashram Salvi.

SEBI alleged that about 15.3 lakh messages were sent in December 2017 and January 2018, that trading volume spiked with each wave of messages, and that a group around Mr Shah, funded in part by him, manipulated both price and volume. It alleged that RCG Finance, the main trader in the earlier price-rise period, moved shares to the Nathwanis and that Mr Salvi traded back and forth with them in reversal trades without financial rationale, adding volume. It also charged Mr Shah with ignoring summons and RCG Finance with failing to disclose crossing 5 percent of the company.

The officer held that Mr Shah, Ms Patel, Earth Exim and Bonanza breached the fraud-prevention rules in the PFUTP Regulations and section 12A of the SEBI Act, and that Mr Salvi and the Nathwanis breached them through reversal trading. RCG Finance was found in breach of the takeover disclosure rule but, having been struck off the companies register, was treated as non-existent and not penalised. The order does not identify who sent the messages.

The penalties were Rs 25 lakh on Mr Shah (Rs 15 lakh under section 15HA and Rs 10 lakh under 15HB for ignoring summons), Rs 15 lakh each on Ms Patel, Earth Exim and Bonanza, and Rs 10 lakh each on Ms Nathwani, Mr Nathwani and Mr Salvi, Rs 1 crore in all.

The record does not show whether anyone appealed, who commissioned the messages, or what profit the group made.

This library tags the matter as price manipulation and pump-and-dump. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-10-31 SEBI order

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-06-30 Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment
SEBI v. Paresh Nathalal Chauhan (Timbor Home bulk-SMS share scheme, remand order, 2025) SEBI (India) 2025-12-31 Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump — judgment
SEBI v. NNM Securities Pvt Ltd and others (Bhatia Communications & Retail (India) Ltd, 2024) SEBI (India) 2024-05-30 Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump — judgment
SEC v. Marc E. Wexler (price manipulation, 2023) SEC 2023-12-05 Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump — judgment
ASIC v. Gabriel Govinda (price manipulation, 2023) ASIC 2023-05-03 Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment
ASIC v. Gabriel Govinda (price manipulation, 2022) ASIC 2022-06-07 Price Manipulation , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment

Record added October 8, 2026. submit a correction.