SEBI v. Coral Hub Limited and others (inflated financial results, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 8, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
On 31 May 2022 a SEBI adjudicating officer penalised Coral Hub Limited and three directors for publishing inflated sales and profit figures for 2008 to 2010, and another company for ignoring a SEBI summons. The penalties total Rs 28 lakh.
The record
| Agency | SEBI (India) |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2022-05-31 |
| Date resolved | 2022-05-31 |
| Court | SEBI adjudicating officer |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Instruments | Coral Hub Limited shares |
| Venue | NSE, BSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Coral Hub Limited ; G.S. Chandrashekar ; Dilip C. Parekh ; G.S. Vishwanatham ; Tutis Technologies Ltd |
| Techniques | Misleading issuer disclosure |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- 2.8m INR
What is alleged to have happened
A SEBI adjudicating officer, Vijayant Kumar Verma, decided the matter on 31 May 2022. The noticees were Coral Hub Ltd (CHL), its chairman G S Chandrashekar, whole-time directors Dilip C Parekh and G S Vishwanatham, and Tutis Technologies Ltd. SEBI began after an anonymous complaint alleged that CHL's revenue and profit were fabricated, and examined April 2008 to June 2010.
SEBI alleged that CHL published false, inflated and misleading financial results for 2008-09 and 2009-10: its reported standalone sales were about Rs 61.1 crore and Rs 88.4 crore, with net profit of about Rs 14.7 crore and Rs 20.1 crore. It alleged that the company and its directors breached section 12A of the SEBI Act and Regulations 3 and 4 of the 2003 fraudulent and unfair trade practices regulations and listing conditions. Tutis was separately alleged to have ignored a summons delivered in May 2013, hampering the investigation.
The officer held that the noticees showed inflated sales and correspondingly inflated profits in the balance sheet, and that Tutis had not complied with the summons. Taking account of a September 2021 whole-time member order in parallel proceedings, the officer imposed Rs 10 lakh on CHL and Rs 5 lakh each on the three directors under section 15HA, and Rs 3 lakh on Tutis under section 15A(a), a total of Rs 28 lakh. The order noted that no gain or investor loss could be computed and that a long time had passed since the conduct.
The record does not show how the inflated figures were produced beyond the order's summary, whether anyone appealed, or what happened to the company's other directors.
This library tags the matter as misleading issuer disclosure. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Misleading issuer disclosure — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-05-31 SEBI order
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.