OSC v. Dennis Wing (2017)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2017 the Ontario Securities Commission alleged that Dennis Wing sold 130,000 Just Energy shares on August 28, 2015, in breach of a June 2015 order permanently barring him from trading. He later settled, accepting a reprimand and a C$120,000 penalty. The charge is breach of a cease-trade order, not insider trading.
The record
| Agency | OSC |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2017-05-04 |
| Date resolved | 2018-05-24 |
| Court | Capital Markets Tribunal (Ontario) |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Dennis Wing |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Ontario Securities Act s.76 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- C$120k
What is alleged to have happened
The Ontario Securities Commission filed its statement of allegations on May 4, 2017; a settlement agreement was reached in May 2018.
On June 24, 2015 a hearing panel had ordered Wing to cease trading permanently, after finding six instances of insider trading and misleading Staff, with total sanctions of about C$2.57 million. The 2017 allegations concern a later trade, on August 28, 2015, from a BMO InvestorLine account, which Staff said breached subsection 122(1)(c) of the Securities Act and was contrary to the public interest.
Under the settlement Wing is reprimanded and pays an administrative penalty of C$120,000. This record was tagged insider trading because the earlier case is described in the documents; the 2017 matter itself is a cease-trade breach, so the tag has been removed. The status was also recorded as dismissed, which is wrong.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
- 2017-05-04 Notice of Hearing
- 2017-05-04 Statement of Allegations
- 2017-06-02 Reasons and Decision
- 2017-06-26 Reasons and Decision
- 2017-12-14 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-01-05 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-02-20 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-03-07 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-03-20 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-04-10 Reasons and Decision
- 2018-05-18 Settlement Agreement
- 2018-05-22 Notice of Hearing
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.