ASIC v. UBS Securities (front running, 2017)
Status unknown
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2017, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission brought an action against UBS Securities, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | ASIC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 17-185MR |
| Date filed | 2017-06-15 |
| Status | unknown |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | UBS Securities |
| Techniques | Front running |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced this matter on June 15, 2017 as release 17-185MR. The respondents named are UBS Securities (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as front running, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-06-15 ASIC media release
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) | SEC | 2023-03-31 | Front Running , Insider Trading | — | settled |
| SEC v. Lawrence Billimek and Alan Williams (front running, 2022) | SEC | 2022-12-20 | Front Running | — | unknown |
| SEC v. Sergei Polevikov, et al. (front running, 2022) | SEC | 2022-08-17 | Front Running | — | dismissed |
| CFTC v. Energy Broker and Its Owner (front running, 2019) | CFTC | 2019-10-01 | Front Running | $1.5m | judgment |
| OSC v. Royal Bank of Canada (front running, 2019) | OSC | 2019-08-26 | Front Running , FX Fixing +3 | — | settled |
| OSC v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2019) | OSC | 2019-08-26 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Front Running +3 | — | settled |