SEC v. Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Mikhail Irzak, Igor Sladkov, and Ivan Yermakov (hack to trade, 2021)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Mikhail Irzak, Igor Sladkov, and Ivan Yermakov, alleging conduct this library classifies as hack to trade. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract. A parallel criminal matter is referenced in the release.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25295 |
| Date filed | 2021-12-22 |
| Date resolved | 2021-12-22 |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes |
| Defendants | Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Mikhail Irzak, Igor Sladkov, ; Ivan Yermakov |
| Techniques | Hack to trade |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on December 22, 2021 as release LR-25295. The respondents named are Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Mikhail Irzak, Igor Sladkov, and Ivan Yermakov (2 individuals, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as hack to trade, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Hack to trade — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2021-12-22 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Robert B. Westbrook (hack to trade, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-27 | Hack To Trade , Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Ieremenko et al.: settlements with Cho, Olefir and Capyield (hack to trade, 2020) | SEC | 2020-11-05 | Hack To Trade , Insider Trading | $425k | settled |
| SEC v. Dubovoy et al.: settlements with eight defendants (hack to trade, 2020) | SEC | 2020-06-10 | Hack To Trade | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Ieremenko et al.: settlements with Kwon and Sabodakha (hack to trade, 2020) | SEC | 2020-04-09 | Hack To Trade , Insider Trading | $149k | settled |
| SEC v. Oleksandr Ieremenko et al. (hack to trade, 2019) | SEC | 2019-01-15 | Hack To Trade | — | filed |
| SEC v. Dubovoy, et al. (hack to trade, 2018) | SEC | 2018-07-10 | Hack To Trade | — | settled |