Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Erik T. Voorhees (unregistered distributions, 2014)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-erik-t-voorhees-unregistered-distributions-2014) by email

In 2014 the SEC settled an administrative order against Erik T. Voorhees for unregistered offerings of FeedZeBirds and SatoshiDICE shares for bitcoin, with $15,000 disgorgement, $844 interest and a $35,000 penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 33-9592
Date filed 2014-06-03
Date resolved 2014-06-03
Status settled
Asset class crypto, equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Erik T. Voorhees (individual)
Techniques Unregistered distributions

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$35k
Disgorgement
$15k
Prejudgment interest
$844
Total relief
$50.8k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

On June 3, 2014 the SEC accepted a settlement with Erik T. Voorhees. The order finds he offered and sold shares of FeedZeBirds and SatoshiDICE in exchange for bitcoin with no registration statement and no exemption, violating Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c). He is ordered to pay $15,000 in disgorgement, $843.98 in interest and a $35,000 penalty, and is barred for five years from taking part in unregistered issuances for virtual currency. The record previously omitted the interest and penalty.

This library tags the matter as unregistered distributions, based on the conduct the document describes. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2014-06-03 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Zachary Miller (unregistered distributions, 2026) SEC 2026-03-05 Unregistered Distributions — settled
SEC v. David Hudzik (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-12-23 Unregistered Distributions $70k judgment
SEC v. Ongkaruck Sripetch and others (pump and dump, 2025) SEC 2025-06-20 Pump And Dump , Unregistered Distributions $204k judgment
SEC v. Peter Scalise III and The3rdBevco Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-06-17 Unregistered Distributions $236k settled
SEC v. Investview, Inc. (unregistered distributions, 2025) SEC 2025-01-17 Unregistered Distributions $375k settled
SEC v. Tai Mo Shan Limited (unregistered distributions, 2024) SEC 2024-12-20 Unregistered Distributions $36.7m settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.